<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CFL Recycling Rates Remain Low</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earth911.com/blog/2008/05/19/cfl-recycling-rates-remain-low/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earth911.com/blog/2008/05/19/cfl-recycling-rates-remain-low/</link>
	<description>Make Everyday Earth Day</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: caeli</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/blog/2008/05/19/cfl-recycling-rates-remain-low/#comment-14901</link>
		<dc:creator>caeli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/blog/2008/05/19/cfl-recycling-rates-remain-low/#comment-14901</guid>
		<description>gary22, the big reason to complain about mercury vs. phosphorus is that mercury is a neurotoxin and a heavy metal, meaning that it can linger in the environment (particularly biomass) for a very long time and can pose harmful effects to the reproductive and nerve systems of what ever animal it gets into. I agree with you on the use of LEDs - I never understood why environmental groups were so big on CFLs from the start, given the mercury issue. (Ironically, I found this website because I'm trying to find a recycling location for CFLs in California!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gary22, the big reason to complain about mercury vs. phosphorus is that mercury is a neurotoxin and a heavy metal, meaning that it can linger in the environment (particularly biomass) for a very long time and can pose harmful effects to the reproductive and nerve systems of what ever animal it gets into. I agree with you on the use of LEDs - I never understood why environmental groups were so big on CFLs from the start, given the mercury issue. (Ironically, I found this website because I&#8217;m trying to find a recycling location for CFLs in California!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kgo</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/blog/2008/05/19/cfl-recycling-rates-remain-low/#comment-14756</link>
		<dc:creator>kgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/blog/2008/05/19/cfl-recycling-rates-remain-low/#comment-14756</guid>
		<description>[...] given away by the millions by local energy companies. You can find a location to recycle CFLs and fhttp://earth911.com/blog/2008/05/19/cfl-recycling-rates-remain-low/Muni driver with most complaints exposed KGO-TV Bay AreaThe I-Team exposes the Muni driver who's had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] given away by the millions by local energy companies. You can find a location to recycle CFLs and fhttp://earth911.com/blog/2008/05/19/cfl-recycling-rates-remain-low/Muni driver with most complaints exposed KGO-TV Bay AreaThe I-Team exposes the Muni driver who&#8217;s had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary22</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/blog/2008/05/19/cfl-recycling-rates-remain-low/#comment-14678</link>
		<dc:creator>gary22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/blog/2008/05/19/cfl-recycling-rates-remain-low/#comment-14678</guid>
		<description>Hi,

The issue about mercury is fine and good; but I don't hear anybody mentioning the phosphorus that is also in florescent bulbs???

Myself I'm looking into LEDs. (Longer life, no phosphorus or mercury)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>The issue about mercury is fine and good; but I don&#8217;t hear anybody mentioning the phosphorus that is also in florescent bulbs???</p>
<p>Myself I&#8217;m looking into LEDs. (Longer life, no phosphorus or mercury)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
